Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-04-08 03:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #4113 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4113 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 55 secrets from Secret Submission Post #589.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)I am just baffled at the idea of anyone looking at Russell from Up and going "that there is a sexist jerk."
Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)We're not saying that the sexist jerk thing isnt prevalent and a problem - it is, especially in TV series and movies aimed at mainstream audiences where everything is edgy and all the canon ships are tropey hetero love triangles and etc etc.
But not a single one? Even in other mediums? They're exceptional because they're so rare, but they do exist. I think it's more the idea that the person can't think of A SINGLE CHARACTER out of everything they've ever read or watched that is making people go WTF.
Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)it seems reasonable in context i guess
Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)TBH it's just classic F!S to have a huge discussion nitpicking the wording of a post instead of the post's content.
Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)I am entertained by it, I have to admit
Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) - 2018-04-08 22:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-09 04:46 am (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)The question of whether they meant a specific genre or kind of character was asked and the answer was no.
Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)I mean, I was giving an example there.
Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Tangent based on #1
(Anonymous) 2018-04-08 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)The point, replying to the anon that said every canon has sexism, was that that is ridiculous to imagine and no one would do this.