case: ([ Woe; Woefish! ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-07-20 05:08 pm

[ SECRET POST #562 ]


⌈ Secret Post #562 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154.


__________________________________________________



155.


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.


__________________________________________________



163.


__________________________________________________



164.


__________________________________________________



165.


__________________________________________________



166.


__________________________________________________



167.


__________________________________________________



168.


__________________________________________________



169.


__________________________________________________



170. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



171.


__________________________________________________



172.


__________________________________________________



173.


__________________________________________________



174.


__________________________________________________



175.


__________________________________________________



176.



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 18 pages, 446 secrets from Secret Submission Post #081.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ], [ 1 - empty comment ], [ 1 - Walken ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 132

[identity profile] likespring.livejournal.com 2008-07-21 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
Seconding what the two above me said.

For one, most mainstream books, movies, and televisions shows aren't going to be as graphic as fanfiction can be. If you pick up a random book in a Barnes & Noble, chances are it's not going to have a gruesome rape scene. I know there are novels out there that may contain explicit rape, but I've never looked at one and wouldn't know one way or another if there is any hint of a warning for non-con. Secondly, moving out of the book realm, some television shows do warn for graphic violence, rape, or other potentially triggering content. And even if they don't warn for that specifically, you might be able to surmise something by "extremely violent content," etc.

And lastly, and most importantly: even if no one in the mainstream entertainment media never warned for rape, that is irrelevant. Ficcers have a choice to warn for triggering content. You can add a small warning that takes an extra few seconds, or you can refuse to do so and instead accept the fact that you are placing the burden on any victim and leaving triggering content out in the open. It's up to author, but then they shouldn't get butthurt when someone calls them on it.

Re: 132

[identity profile] relmneiko.livejournal.com 2008-07-21 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
For one, most mainstream books, movies, and televisions shows aren't going to be as graphic as fanfiction can be

I'm going to have to disagree, especially when it comes to film. Having something visually presented to you like in film can reach levels that words never can, IMHO. The most disturbing scenes that I can bring to mind are all from films - mainstream or not, I'm not sure what qualifies here, because the visual (and audio!) element is so important.

It depends highly on what sort of books you're reading, and I'd hesitate to make that statement. With TV, of course (unless you're on HBO), everything is censored. But there's a difference between a film/TV rating that says 'extremely violent content' and a fic warning that says "dismemberment, deathfic, tort, sadism, blah blah blah."

Why is it irrelevant? Why does mainstream media get a free card, while as ficwriters, convention presses us into writing warnings?

Re: 132

[identity profile] likespring.livejournal.com 2008-07-21 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
It is irrelevant as to the choice fic writers make. Nowhere did I say that mainstream entertainment gets a free pass (in fact, they get some criticism of their own that fic rarely gets). I've actually seen TV shows (granted, I watch mostly news and similar shows) that have specific warnings such as "This segment contains graphic depictions/discussion of rape. Viewer discretion advised." While that's not my number one cause, if possible, I do think it's a good idea for them to do that. I don't see why it's such a big deal for fic writers to do something similar and warn for triggering content, and saying "But so-and-so doesn't have to do it!" is a poor excuse.

To be clear, I don't think someone should have to warn/label for every single little thing if they don't want, but I do think it's common decency to warn for something that might trigger someone. And since I've heard some people say "but it would ruin the surprise!" (personally, I think if the surprise of rape/graphic torture is more important that not triggering people that's really stupid, but whatever), there are ways to still warn without spoiling everyone else -- you can put the warnings in white text, put it on a different page, or put it at the end of the story with a spoiler space before it, so only people who want to read the warnings have to read them.

If you don't warn, then people are going to be forced to skip anything without a warning; if you do warn like the previous three examples, most people remain unspoiled, but those with triggers still might get to read your story, and you might get feedback. It's a win-win and I don't see what's so hard about it.
Edited 2008-07-21 04:55 (UTC)

Re: 132

(Anonymous) 2008-07-21 04:41 am (UTC)(link)
Are you serious?

What published fiction have you been reading? YA?

Re: 132

[identity profile] likespring.livejournal.com 2008-07-21 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
Stuff without rampant rape?

What fiction have you been reading?

Re: 132

(Anonymous) 2008-07-21 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
This will sound hilariously srspost, but: George R.R. Martin.

Re: 132

[identity profile] likespring.livejournal.com 2008-07-21 04:45 am (UTC)(link)
I'm familiar with the titles of his books, but I've never read them.

I think there's only been one book I've read where there's been a rape scene, however graphic (A Time to Kill by John Grisham) and some have had violence but nothing incredibly graphic.

Re: 132 (Same anon!)

(Anonymous) 2008-07-21 04:44 am (UTC)(link)
Additionally, I had a lot of friends, when I was a teenager, who read and adored V.C. Andrews. Those books are rape fantasy at their best.

Re: 132

[identity profile] shunraiken.livejournal.com 2008-07-21 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
But you can typically tell from a fic's rating and its genre whether or not there might be something potentially squicky in it. Something rated R or NC-17 under a "horror" or "tragedy" category is probably going to have some pretty dark stuff. Now, you might not know exactly what said dark stuff is, but you should still be able to get an idea that things are not going to be all fluffy bunnies.

I tend to assume that if something is rated R or NC-17, there's either going to be explicit sex or graphic violence or rape. The summary usually gives a pretty good indication of which of the two it's going to be.

Re: 132

[identity profile] likespring.livejournal.com 2008-07-21 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
It really depends.

I recall one Harry Potter fic, for example -- I can't recall if it had any warnings and if so which ones, but it was rated NC-17 and the summary was something along the lines of it being an alternate universe in which Voldemort won and Harry Potter because the slave/toy of the Death Eaters. For that story, I certainly assumed there would be torture, rape, and other dark themes.

However, not all summaries are so upfront. And unless you're on a site like Fanfiction.Net, FictionAlley, etc., with categories, a fic may not be classified as such. A lot of people who archive on LiveJournal or their own websites don't categorize their stories under a certain genre.

I've read numerous stories in which the summary makes the story sound like a typical, fluffy or at least happy get-together story. And then bam, in the middle you get a rape scene. (Same for stories with things like child abuse.) Sometimes it's because for some reason the author doesn't think it's rape (which is a larger problem; I had to leave one fandom because practically every fic, no matter how "fluffy" the summary claimed to be, somehow mentioned rape [and it had nothing to do with canon, backstory, etc]) or because the author just plain refuses to provide an accurate warning or even summary, many times even after being politely asked by a number of people to do so.

Re: 132

[identity profile] shunraiken.livejournal.com 2008-07-22 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
When there isn't a genre listed I tend to go by rating and summary. If I can't get a good idea of what a fic is going to be about from the summary, then personally I just skip it and move on to something else, usually because when I'm searching for fics I'm in the mood for something particular at the moment (fluff, angst, whatever).

See, the only problem with that is that not everyone considers a mere mention of rape to be worthy of warning about. I wouldn't warn if I just mentioned that it happened but didn't go into graphic detail because it simply wouldn't occur to me to do so. Not everyone gets squicked by the same things. Personally, I have a big squick about eyes... anything about gouging out or otherwise damaging eyes = no no no do not want for me. However, that's not something that most people would warn for specifically, and I don't feel that I have any right to get upset over not being warned for something that happens to bother me.

I guess what it comes down to is that no one is really OBLIGATED to warn for anything if they don't really want to. I don't get warnings on the books that I buy, so I tend not to expect them on fics either. If an author does warn, fine, that's cool. If not, there's always the back button.

Re: 132

[identity profile] likespring.livejournal.com 2008-07-22 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
No, I'm not saying the mere mention of rape requires a warning. I don't think it does. That particular parenthetical comment was more to just add to the side comment on how fandom sometimes treats rape.

My main point was that I encountered numerous stories in which the rating and summary lead one to believe it's a happy, safe story -- or at lest doesn't contain any dark themes -- and then all of the sudden you have a graphic rape scene. It's not that you can't deduce the story from the summary, it's that the author posts a very misleading one.

And I would guess that the number of rape victims combined with the number of people who may not have been raped but are still very upset by it is much greater than the number of people who are squicked by eyes being damaged. That's a totally legitimate squick and I understand that, but while it's true that you can't expect everything to be catered to, it's not as hard to warn for something that's well-known to be not just a squick but a trigger to many people.

Re: 132

[identity profile] shunraiken.livejournal.com 2008-07-22 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
Still, generally you can tell where a fic is going several paragraphs before it actually gets there (unless it's a really, really bad fic), which seems to me would be plenty of time to hit the back button before you get to the really upsetting parts. Like I said, you don't get warnings on books, so I'm having a bit of trouble understanding why fic should be so different. Some people warn, some don't. It's really a personal choice, and I don't feel that an author should be forced into anything if they don't want to. Will they end up losing potential readers? Possibly, but again, that's their own choice.

If the rating is misleading, then I'd consider that to be worthy of complaint because I DO believe if you're going to employ the rating system as a courtesy to your readers that you should do it properly. Trying to sneak graphic stuff into a PG-13 fic isn't cool because a lot of readers rely on ratings to make decisions about what they read. But again, they're not really under any obligation to rate their fics either... just to rate it properly if they do choose to do so.

Re: 132

[identity profile] likespring.livejournal.com 2008-07-22 04:40 am (UTC)(link)
Not always. Sometimes it's "this could be that, but it could go either way" or it is just out of the blue. If summaries and preceding paragraphs could give the reader all the information they needed, I doubt there'd even be warnings. No one's forcing them to do so, but as I've said before, if someone chooses not to warn for graphic rape, and refuses to add any kind of warning even after being politely asked to do so, then they, of all people, don't need to get butthurt and offended when people do leave feedback telling them why it upset them.

Especially when there's so many different ways to warn that makes a win-win situation for everyone. I see absolutely no reason for someone to refuse to warn in any way, shape, or form, for triggering things like rape. It takes a few extra seconds, keeps people from getting upset, and potentially gains some readers. Wow, we can't do that.

Re: 132

[identity profile] shunraiken.livejournal.com 2008-07-22 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
I can't say I've ever seen a fic where there haven't been enough hints for me to be able to say "hmm, it looks like this might be going in a bad direction." And if it bothers you and you get to something that looks like it could potentially go in a direction you don't like, why keep reading it and risk upsetting yourself? I don't get it.

See, my point is, why should the author be forced to warn if they don't want to? Sure, it's the courteous thing to do, but it's their fic and if they don't want to warn for anything that's their own choice. People have the right be upset by it, but I don't think they should feel that they therefore have the right to dictate what an author does with his or her fic.

I'm not claiming to understand it, I just dislike the mindset that an author is somehow obligated to do anything with their own work.

Re: 132

[identity profile] likespring.livejournal.com 2008-07-22 04:55 am (UTC)(link)
Because you can't always see it coming. And even if you can, it'd be nice to know beforehand before you get 50%, 75%, 90% through a story and have to hit the back button because the author decided to pop a rape scene in.

No one's forcing them to warn. There is no law making the author warn. But the only legitimate reason I can really see to not do so is if the author doesn't want to "spoil" certain parts for other readers. However, there are ways to still warn for those who need it without spoiling others -- whiting it out, placing it on another page that you have to follow a link to get to, putting it at the bottom of the story with a spoiler space, etc. If you still refuse to do any of those, I can't see any other reason than just plain "I dun wanna! YOU CAN'T MAKE ME!" Which someone has every right to do, but I also have every right to criticize them for being inconsiderate.
Edited 2008-07-22 04:55 (UTC)

Re: 132

[identity profile] shunraiken.livejournal.com 2008-07-22 05:00 am (UTC)(link)
That's fair enough! And I'd actually never thought of those methods of warning before. I haven't written anything with really questionable content myself, but I know that I personally hate being spoiled for things so I tend to go with as few warnings as possible.

Re: 132

[identity profile] likespring.livejournal.com 2008-07-22 05:03 am (UTC)(link)
I haven't either. I think the worst thing I've (jokingly, obviously!) warned for is lawyers. :)

I've seen tons of people use the white spoiler space, but the other two are less common in my experience. I understand someone not wanting to spoil other readers, but it's when someone outright refuses other options, even when someone politely explains why it's upsetting without warnings and suggests alternative ways to warn, that really gets me. That, to me, is just being stubborn.

Re: 132

[identity profile] shunraiken.livejournal.com 2008-07-22 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
The one thing I hate warnings for the most is character death. It just... ruins the fic for me because I spend the entire time sitting there wondering who is going to die and when, and then when it happens it doesn't have as much emotional impact for me because I was expecting someone to kick the bucket. I'd much rather not see it coming and not have it constantly at the back of my mind.