[ SECRET POST #4125 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4125 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________








05. [SPOILERS for NCIS]

[NCIS, Caitlin Todd]


__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Black Panther]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for A Series of unfortunate Events]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for sex/dubcon]
https://i.imgur.com/IpzsszH.png
[American Horror Story: Murder House]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for sexual abuse]

[TGWTG/ChannelAwesome]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #590.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Based on 3

[nightscale]

The 80's(?) Dune movie, I didn't get it as a kid, I watched it as an adult and I still don't understand most of what's going on.

Sand worms, floating guy, THE SPICE MUST FLOW. ???

Re: Based on 3

[philstar22]

I don't get the movie, and I love the book and have read it many times. The movie is just strange, and not in a good way.

Re: Based on 3

[greghousesgf]

the movie had far more to do with David Lynch fucking around and being his usual weirdass self than anything in the books.

Re: Based on 3

[nightscale]

I've not read the book(books?) but I hear they've got way more in them than can be properly conveyed in 2 hours. The mini-series the BBC did many years ago made a lot more sense and I liked that.

Re: Based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

Part of the problem was that the financiers were expecting a two hour version, while the rough cut was almost four hours long and Lynch intended his cut to be about three hours long. So, instead of doing the three hour version, a bunch of stuff was excised and new concentrated or simplified scenes were filmed and narration was added. There was a longer version shown on television in two parts in 1988 where I guess they put some stuff back in, but Lynch disavowed that version and had his name taken off of it. But, I'll tell you something, that television version was the first version I saw and I liked it and it made sense to me. Enough so that I immediately went and found the book to read and I ended up loving the book. So, if you can find the extended edition, which has a running time that's 50 minutes longer than the theatrical release, it might make more sense.

Re: Based on 3

[dancing_serpent]

I loved the movie, but I don't think I would have understood much if I hadn't read the books so many times.

Re: Based on 3

[syncing_feeling]

I finally saw this recently after avoiding it for years. I tried to like it on account of it being one of my partner's favourite movies, not in a so-bad-it's-good way but he genuinely loves it. I just found it to be a weird mix of boring, confusing and... idk, uncomfortable?

Though I did appreciate the blink-and-you'll-miss-it scene of Patrick Stewart going into battle while holding a tiny adorable puppy. I think. Maybe my brain made that up.

Re: Based on 3

[dancing_serpent]

No, you remembered that correctly. *g*

I'm one of those people who loves the movie, too, and there are tons of blink-and-you'll-miss-it scenes in there. Scenes people might miss even if they had read the books (which are super awesome) and were prepared for the weirdness.

Re: Based on 3

[(Anonymous)]

My dad took me to see that in the theater when it came out (I was 11, great choice there, dad.) They actually gave us little booklet things to explain what was going on. I still didn't get it.