Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2018-05-23 06:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #4158 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4158 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #595.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Huh.
(Anonymous) 2018-05-24 12:22 am (UTC)(link)2) It's possible OP has in mind some totally unrelated stuff that their MIL does, but... they specifically brought up her IRL dating. I'm going to go with that being a motivation for why MIL's choice of crushes might be infuriating.
Nah, can't agree. Again, OP specifies that they object to the MIL's fangirling around OP.
Re: Huh.
(Anonymous) 2018-05-24 12:35 am (UTC)(link)The way that you frame and express your negative reactions does affect how people respond to them - I'm not sure that you can just draw a black box and call it "negative feelings" and never comment on what's inside it. And, again, OP doesn't even frame it as an emotional reaction, OP just states it like it's a fact, which also affects how people interpret it.
It's possible OP has in mind some totally unrelated stuff that their MIL does, but... they specifically brought up her IRL dating. I'm going to go with that being a motivation for why MIL's choice of crushes might be infuriating. Nah, can't agree. Again, OP specifies that they object to the MIL's fangirling around OP.
OP objects to several different things but the phrasing of the secret makes it seem as though OP finds the crushes objectionable in themselves, not only objectionable because of the gushing or the reminder of IRL behavior. She calls the crushes "gross", and she doesn't just object to the gushing, she objects to the gushing "over dudes young enough to be her son". I think, at the very least, it's extremely reasonable to read OP as disliking the crushes themselves, and not just the gushing.
Re: Huh.
(Anonymous) 2018-05-24 12:38 am (UTC)(link)Sure, OP dislikes the crushes. But you have to consider the context, which OP also provides.
Re: Huh.
(Anonymous) 2018-05-24 12:45 am (UTC)(link)At the beginning of this thread, you said that it was reading comprehension fail (or that people want to know "what gets their elders off in the name of tolerance"). That's the part that I really disagree with you on. The reason people think that OP is judgy isn't because of reading comprehension fail, it's because OP called their MIL a pathetic piece of shit.
Re: Huh.
(Anonymous) 2018-05-24 12:49 am (UTC)(link)I said reading comprehension fail because so many people read the secret and think that OP is against fandom in general or older people in fandom or wants to dictate who their MIL fangirls over. I think that's a pretty significant misread of the secret text.