[ SECRET POST #4165 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4165 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #596.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I hate secrets like this. I want to give the OP the benefit of the doubt and that they are embarrassed about naming names. But part of me thinks that they are leaving out details to generate more interest in their secret.

[(Anonymous)]

Sometimes people leave out details to generate more discussion, and that's a good thing, because it keeps the community alive.

In this particular case, who the celebrity is can kill any discussion in a major way. 9/10 times if OP names the celebrity, the comments will just be wank over whether or not he's a hideous extraterrestrial, or whether or not he actually has the great personality OP claims he does, etc. If OP keeps it vague there's a chance that the discussion might actually be an interesting one on the ethics of celebrity crushes.

[(Anonymous)]

And what if they are?

OP

[(Anonymous)]

I actually am embarrassed about naming names, but also I didn't want people to discuss whether or not he really is as lovely as I claim him to be (because he really is).