[ SECRET POST #4188 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4188 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01. https://s33.postimg.cc/hv89rrhqn/s22.jpg
[OP wanted a warning for spiders, also everything below is spoilers and etc.]




__________________________________________________



02. https://s33.postimg.cc/olor17zrj/s21.jpg
[OP warned for gore/death]


__________________________________________________





















03. [SPOILERS for Hereditary]


__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Hogwarts Mystery]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Vampyr]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Digimon Adventure Tri]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Blue Exorcist]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Solo]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Solo]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Solo]




__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for discussion of suicide]



__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for discussion of suicide]




__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for discussion of suicide]




__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for discussion of child porn]



__________________________________________________



15. [WARNING for discussion of sexual abuse]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #599.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I find it hard to hold Watsuki exclusively responsible when Japan's laws on possession were only changed in 2014. I also find it hard to decide something has literally no elements of sympathy to it when we don't know anything but that simple conviction.

You might get charged with possession because viewing or owning those images was a coping mechanism for something bad that happened to you. It doesn't make viewing or possession legal, and it doesn't make it okay to have viewed or possessed, but it does make you (the struggling and flawed human being who's trying to be get by) more sympathetic.

Or maybe it just makes you someone who grew up in a society that didn't inherently teach you these things weren't okay.

I guess this is my way of saying that knowledge of a criminal conviction doesn't always strictly affect my view of a person or their work. There are a lot of factors that go into something being a good person or a bad person, I don't think "having a criminal conviction" is a clear indicator of one side or another (ask the Americans who've been charged with possession of the drug recently legalized in Canada).