case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-06-25 07:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #4191 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4191 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.



__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 63 secrets from Secret Submission Post #600.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-06-26 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Because anyone who was once a child is forever disallowed to be in love or have sex, as that is PEDOPHILIAAAA

or some shit

(Anonymous) 2018-06-26 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
This is so bizarre to me. Is Harry Potter fanart still wrong now that he's canonically 37 years old just because we met him when he was 11?

(Anonymous) 2018-06-26 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
DA: I've seen people say that all Homestuck porn is gross because they're 13 when the comic starts, despite them all canonically ageing as the comic goes on and now officially all being 18 at least. So yes, I'm sure people will say that Harry Potter fan art is still wrong.