case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-07-11 07:28 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #4207 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4207 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #602.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Re: Eating animals/rant/idk

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
Uhhh, yes. Animal shelters kill pets (legally) all the time. Did you not know that???

Re: Eating animals/rant/idk

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
and you have no right to be sad

and you have no right to be sad

and you have no right to be sad

and you have no right to be sad

Re: Eating animals/rant/idk

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
....what? Where did I say that? Can you please show me? Or are you just ranting because you are OP and did not get the answer you liked?

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
I never said that. I said "If you sell someone an animal, they can do anything they legally want with it. That includes eating it. Most poeple don't care about chickens. Especially roosters." Some idiot replied to me saying that.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: ayrt

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-07-12 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
Well, when everyone is anon, it's hard to tell who said what.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
It is a fairly clear back and forth.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: ayrt

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-07-12 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
I guess not or there would be no confusion?

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 05:23 am (UTC)(link)
The "fake quote" didn't at all tip you off?

Re: Eating animals/rant/idk

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
No, I'm not OP. I know this, because where I live it's legal to keep roosters, I am perfectly happy to eat chicken, and I hate roosters.
I was quoting the post which you replied to, but didn't seem to understand: Your response to OP criticised them for being sad their pet was killed and eaten by people who advertised themselves as (more or less) a no-kill shelter. I was asserting their right to be sad in the face of rampant douchebaggery.
Clear?

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Neat. But I never said anything about that. They can be sad. They can be happy. It has nothing to do with what I said. You quoted someone who completely misrepresented what I said.

da

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
Um, those are YOUR words.

Re: Eating animals/rant/idk

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
You have a right to be sad, of course. But you don't really have a right to be surprised or expect something different to happen?

Re: Eating animals/rant/idk

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
When they advertise on their website as (going by OP's post and not seeing the website for myself, obvs) a no-kill shelter or something along those lines? Uh, yes? Of course you have the goddamn right to be surprised they killed and ate your pet??? After they took it and said "No worries we will definitely find Kylo Hen a nice new home where no-one will eat him"???

Re: Eating animals/rant/idk

(Anonymous) 2018-07-12 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
Whatever, it's not really a useful conversation to have, either way I agree that OP's emotions are valid
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only