[ SECRET POST #4210 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4210 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #603.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

There's definitely a lot of stupid, endlessly frustrating bullshit on the Internet. At the same time, I'm pretty sure that I would strongly disagree with a lot of your examples here if you had given any actual details.

[(Anonymous)]

Why are you an anti? Do you think that harassment is okay. Why do you just know you'd disagree with any examples the OP had? Why are you proud of being so stubborn you just know you'd disagree with examples you know nothing of?

[(Anonymous)]

Why are you an anti?

Where'd you get that idea?

Why do you just know you'd disagree with any examples the OP had?

Maybe I wouldn't. Anything's possible. But in my experience with people who talk like OP does, they almost always have a lot of definitions and ideas that I disagree with. The idea that there's a "cycle of outrage that provides their source of leisure time", for instance, very often is used of people who are making very reasonable criticisms of bad things. The idea of "self-flagellating" and "taking in bigoted rhetoric and spitting it back out under the guise of progress" - almost anything could be meant by those ideas, and I see no reason to think that OP's idea of "bigoted rhetoric" is one that I would agree with.

Nothing about OP said is actually wrong, but their language is so vague and imprecise that it could really mean almost anything. And in practice, my experience is that saying things like this is usually used as a criticism of paying any kind of attention at all to social justice.