[ SECRET POST #4210 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4210 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #603.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I'm a furry, I draw furry porn, no species weirds me out. But I'm not sure if I should feel weird about drawing clean, G-rated art of anthro characters based on my real pets (not dogs, incidentally), because to some people, making them humanoid is inherently "sexualizing" even though I made the drawings as non-sexual as possible. I just wanted to draw something cute and innocent based on my pets, I don't think there's any need to consider that creepy.

But I understand the dog thing, even though I don't mind porn of dog characters in general. I do get uncomfortable when I see porn of any furry character that looks like any of my pets (past or present) even though I know the artist intended them to be OCs and didn't base them on any real animal.