case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-07-27 07:04 pm

[ SECRET POST #4223 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4223 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________

























03. [SPOILERS for Luke Cage season 2]

[Shades/Comanche]


__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Infinity War]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Luke Cage season 2]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Dunkirk]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of bestiality]

[Black Mirror, "The National Anthem"]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #603.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Disney/Fox merger is good to go.

(Anonymous) 2018-07-27 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/21st-century-fox-disney-merger-shareholder-vote-1202888023/

Re: Disney/Fox merger is good to go.

(Anonymous) 2018-07-27 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
booo, hiss, strengthen antitrust legislation

Re: Disney/Fox merger is good to go.

(Anonymous) 2018-07-27 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Disney won't even own 40% of 'entertainment'. They are nowhere near being a danger.

Re: Disney/Fox merger is good to go.

(Anonymous) 2018-07-27 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Where exactly do you draw the line, with "being a danger"? I think there's significant problems that arise from economic concentration and centralization and having a very small number of hyper-massive firms in an area, even if no single one of those firms controls a majority of that sector. I think it's simplistic to look at it as "Oh, well, they'll own less than 40% of this sector so it's fine". And I know that we had, in the past, much more stringent regulations about this sort of thing than we do now, and I think that was a good thing.

Re: Disney/Fox merger is good to go.

(Anonymous) 2018-07-28 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
At the very least, a lot of people are going to lose their jobs, and the rumor is that Disney will probably dismantle 20th C Fox Studios. So creative people in the film industry are going to have fewer places to pitch their work, among other things.

Re: Disney/Fox merger is good to go.

(Anonymous) 2018-07-27 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Fucking hell, especially in light of the precedent set by James Gunn being fired.

Re: Disney/Fox merger is good to go. /

(Anonymous) 2018-07-28 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
Wait, what? The news is so convoluted these days that I can't keep up with it or keep anything straight anymore. How did he end up fired? What happened?

Re: Disney/Fox merger is good to go. /

(Anonymous) 2018-07-28 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
Controversial tweets made in 2009, that he apologized for in 2012 (long before he was hired), which were then cynically brought up by alt-right fuckheads
ninety6tears: jim w/ red bground (merlin)

Re: Disney/Fox merger is good to go. /

[personal profile] ninety6tears 2018-07-28 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't realize he apologized that long ago. Damn.

Re: Disney/Fox merger is good to go. / AYRT

(Anonymous) 2018-07-28 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
Just further proof that apologies and efforts to do better are worthless. Mess up and you're scum 5ever to those pissbabies.

Re: Disney/Fox merger is good to go. / AYRT

(Anonymous) 2018-07-28 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
It's important to keep in mind that this particular instance was in just completely obvious and blatant bad faith.