[ SECRET POST #4243 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4243 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #607.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: How do you feel about fans changing a significant attribute of a character?

[(Anonymous)]

In theory, I have no issue with fans' headcanons or AUs (If it's a valid interpretation/the source material doesn't directly contradict it, it's a headcanon. If it's directly contradicted by the source material, it's an AU.)

In execution -- meh? I've seen it done really well. I've also seen it done really poorly. Some of it might as well be called "Fun With Stereotypes." Every canon character who does not 100% embrace gender roles will be headcanoned trans, because if you were AMAB, you can never be truly girly, I guess. However, most of the stuff that's done poorly is more on the harmless side, so it's not so much that I'm not okay with it as it is that I am going to back-button right the heck out. You want to "headcanon" that Tony Stark is actually a 19-year-old girl masquerading as a middle-aged man through the judicious use of Life Model Decoys and body doubles for reasons? You do you, but I'm out.