[ SECRET POST #4244 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4244 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.
[Jane Austen's Emma]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________


















05. [SPOILERS for The 100]

[Monty Green/Harper McIntyre]


__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of incest]

[The 100]


__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of fictional shota/bestiality/rape]























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #607.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

You're still judging them for being into it by feeling like that's an issue but some miscellaneous other kinks wouldn't be. If you said "I judge people who don't put all their sex stuff on a separate sideblog," or "I judge people who don't put all their sex stuff behind a cut," or something, then fine - but that's not what you're doing, because what you're doing actually is still judging people for their fictional kinks. Why should someone who likes fictional bestiality be judged more harshly for being open about it than someone who likes fictional vore, or fictional figging, or fictional sounding? (Or real-life figging or sounding, for that matter, too.) The only reason is that you do think those kinks are worse and more objectionable. If it was about just exposing other people to sexual content they might not be expecting - which I personally do judge people for, I think you should give people fair warning, but I'm fine with people being open about it so long as that's the case - then you wouldn't be focusing in on those specific things.

[(Anonymous)]

Wouldn't the "or whatever" in the secret imply figging and vore and sounding and all that are included?