[ SECRET POST #4258 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4258 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________




















03. [SPOILERS for Netflix's Death Note]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Room]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Hap and Leonard season 2]

[Tiffany Mack]


__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Banana Fish]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Queen of the Sylphs]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Cloak and Dagger]
[WARNING for discussion of sexual assault]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of suicide, sexual assault, #metoo]

[Anthony Bourdain, Asia Argento]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #609.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

They're trying to make a Guy Ritchie movie without Guy Ritchie.

[(Anonymous)]

That's not really that hard

Guy Ritchie is not that good of a director

[(Anonymous)]

No but that's the point: they're trying to imitate a not-even-that-great director's style for their weird fantasy/grungy/whatever adaption of a classic when that didn't even really work when the not-even-that-great director himself did it.

[(Anonymous)]

IMO that's actually a smart move! Because the fact that Guy Ritchie isn't a great director means that there's room for improvement, and an obvious way to make improvement happen by just getting a more competent director in.

Obviously that uhhhhhh doesn't seem to have happened but I respect the intiative