[ SECRET POST #4317 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4317 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #618.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

But it's reasonable to wonder about that. Wondering about that isn't bad, the part that's bad is where you frame that as insane and unreasonable and hateful and an example of the PC police destroying comedy and free speech.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not here to judge good/bad - that's really boring to me - I'm just saying that the headline makes a claim the interviewees don't actually make or even imply. In fact, they wisely skirt around the issue.

[(Anonymous)]

The point that I'm making is that "wondering whether they could still perform some skits" is not the same as "worrying about PC culture ruining comedy".

[(Anonymous)]

OK, well it seems you're intentionally misreading and/or missing the point of my comments, so I'm out.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think that the interview in any way contradicts the headline, although it's as sensationalistic as headlines have to be. I think that your framing of the interview in your first post is a much less accurate representation of it than the headline is. I dunno what else to tell you.