case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-10-30 06:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #4318 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4318 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 25 secrets from Secret Submission Post #618.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2018-10-31 04:01 am (UTC)(link)
DA

"when AO3 has content that anyone would agree is pedophilia?"

Point. But the thing is, so do lots of places. I've seen stories that suddenly dove into 12-year-olds banging on ff.net, for all it claims to eschew such things. Steven King's "It" was in my high school library when I was a kid. And neither of those stories were up front about their contents so I could avoid them. You know what place has a robust tagging and rating system so I *can* avoid that shit? The archive we're discussing. So I support AO3, even as it hosts content I personally disapprove of. Okay?