case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-11-09 06:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #4328 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4328 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.
[The Red Green Show]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Overwatch]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for The Haunting of Hill House]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #619.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ninety6tears: lucrezia side profile (borgias)

[personal profile] ninety6tears 2018-11-10 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
I think the sequence with the story of the warren getting trapped in the tunnels is pretty upsetting, but the "omg, the bad rabbit with his bloody jaw!" isn't that big a deal and that's the image people seem to go back to. But I never saw it as a kid.

I hope this is good, but "family friendly" makes me worry. Just because it doesn't have to be a gory story doesn't mean it's supposed to be accessible for all ages.

(Anonymous) 2018-11-10 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
I mean, it *is* for children, so it should be accessible to children who are not too small and sensitive for characters in peril/deaths of non-main characters occurring when said characters are all rabbits.

The book was literally written for children, so I think children should be able to enjoy the movie, but parents of sensitive children might give it a watch ahead of time, I think that's appropriate.
greghousesgf: (Hugh SF Music)

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2018-11-10 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
it was meant for kids??! really?

(Anonymous) 2018-11-10 05:45 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt - Eh, not really. It began with the author telling his two daughters stories about rabbits, but the novel isn't a children's novel and generally isn't marketed as such, either.
ninety6tears: TLJ Rey (hairstyle from back) (sw: rey)

[personal profile] ninety6tears 2018-11-10 07:48 am (UTC)(link)
I was going to say, it appears in a lot of classrooms but I'd never heard of it as children's lit? The hassle of getting it published always sounded like people just didn't get this adult book about talking bunnies.
greghousesgf: (House Wilson Embrace)

[personal profile] greghousesgf 2018-11-10 06:05 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, that sounded like bullhraka to me....

(Anonymous) 2018-11-10 10:27 am (UTC)(link)
As a child (and even as an adult!) it was always the flashback to the crush in the warren that got me, and stuck with my for years, though I misassociated it with the beginning of the film at one point.

It was on the other year at Easter when I was with my son (who was about 3) and I put it on and quickly turned it off again when I remembered how it got (he also wasn't interested)