[ SECRET POST #4363 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4363 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________














05. [SPOILERS for Star Trek Discovery]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

[Fantastic Beasts. Dumbledore and Grindelwald]


__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of rape]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of rape]












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #624.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It's possible, but if you read the offical descriptions for Queenie and Jacob's characters, it's clear that's not what they were going for with the story at all.

http://collider.com/fantastic-beasts-2-character-descriptions/#jacob-kowalski

[(Anonymous)]

So we have to take on the perspective of what they were going for? The creators can be wrong. It was rape.

[(Anonymous)]

Would you also defend the Jaime/Cercei rape in GoT, because it wasn't what the creators were going for?

[(Anonymous)]

We literally saw Cersei protesting, so no.