[ SECRET POST #4369 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4369 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 10 secrets from Secret Submission Post #625.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

asking seriously: WHY. what part of "lesbian" and "gay" are loaded or not neutral?

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

It doesn't include bi girls is the reasoning.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Then, LGBT?

wlw sounds like something you would have seen on craigslist in the prostitutes section.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, if that's where you liked to spend your time, I guess you'd know?

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

I read the news. You should try it some time.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

I think it sounds dumb too, but lgbt includes gay guys so it doesn't work as a substitute.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Yes it does??? The fuck are you on about. Jeez. You know "straight" doesn't differentiate between straight men or straight women. Gonna start using wlm to describe myself.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Lgbt includes dudes. Gay and bi dudes by definition are not women loving women. Do you not see why the a more specific terminology would be useful for certain situations? What is your issue here, I'm kinda lost.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

They're just an idiot. Nothing to see here.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

The challenge is finding a term that includes the set of all people who are women and who are attracted to other women, and that includes no one else.

So, LGBT doesn't work for this purpose because it includes many people who are not women attracted to other women. Similarly, "lebian" doesn't work because there are women who are attracted to women but are not lesbians.

If you can find a better term, feel free! But there's a reason people use it.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Why does there need to be a separate thing?

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Because... there are times that you want to specifically talk about that specific group of people?

I don't really get the question. It's useful to have words for things, I guess?

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Because "lesbian" means you're a woman ONLY attracted to women, which by definition excludes bi-women. WLW includes bi-women, just like MLM includes bi-men.

Re: nayrt

[ayebydan]

this.

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

That is stupid. So are bi women wlmw? Or wlsmsw? Or wlw25%m75%?

Re: nayrt

[(Anonymous)]

They are both "wlw" and "wlm".

These aren't exclusive categories...

Re: nayrt

[ayebydan]

You are aware people can use more than one label at a time. So yes, bi women are women who love women. Then we can also use other labels. Stay mad about it.