[ SECRET POST #4382 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4382 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #627.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[philstar22]

I feel like romance authors are told they must write their male characters as "alpha males" or they won't get published. Because every single romance book I've picked up has to call their male character an alpha. And in the past few years, they've all been exactly the same.

[(Anonymous)]

But where does that come from? I mean, are they just being stupid, or is it an accurate representation of the market?

[philstar22]

I honestly don't know. I will say, one of the hottest erotica books I ever read had a so-called alpha male but was femdom. It was interesting to see a character who fit those stereotypes and yet was submissive. But I do think publishers to a certain extent are making assumptions. I think there are plenty of women who would buy other stuff.

[(Anonymous)]

It's a requirement for publication in a lot of major romance lines. Mainstream romance tends to be painfully formulaic because there's literally a formula authors are expected to follow in order to adhere to the house style.