case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-01-03 06:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #4382 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4382 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 09 secrets from Secret Submission Post #627.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-01-04 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
But where does that come from? I mean, are they just being stupid, or is it an accurate representation of the market?
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2019-01-04 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
I honestly don't know. I will say, one of the hottest erotica books I ever read had a so-called alpha male but was femdom. It was interesting to see a character who fit those stereotypes and yet was submissive. But I do think publishers to a certain extent are making assumptions. I think there are plenty of women who would buy other stuff.

(Anonymous) 2019-01-05 05:29 am (UTC)(link)
It's a requirement for publication in a lot of major romance lines. Mainstream romance tends to be painfully formulaic because there's literally a formula authors are expected to follow in order to adhere to the house style.