case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-01-05 03:39 pm

[ SECRET POST #4384 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4384 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Mystery Science Theater 3000/The Flintstones]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Celebrity chef and food critic Andrew Zimmern]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Fantastic Beasts 2]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Jake Lacy]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Romeo + Juliet]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Anna Faris and Chris Evans in "What's Your Number?"]


__________________________________________________



08.
['Into You' by Ariana Grande]








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 49 secrets from Secret Submission Post #628.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - text comment ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-01-06 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
I never said anything that even hinted that the HP fandom wasn't enormous. I only pointed out that Rowling isn't the only author to have a large enough fan base of enthusiastic fans who would also ask for more details. It's pretty silly to imply that the size of the fandom gives Rowling no other option but to tweet out endless updates about the canon and that the reason why no other authors do it is because their fandoms are too small.

And that you can't think of an example doesn't mean they don't exist -- it's that when JKR tweets a headcanon it gets retweeted a million times and ends up on various news sites.

And you think that's got absolutely nothing to do with the fact that she tweets out headcanons a lot more than any other popular writer? It's down to size of her fandom alone?