[ SECRET POST #4394 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4394 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #629.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Spoilers for Assassin's Creed: Odyssey DLC

[fishnchips]

... I mean, yeah, it sucks, but what did people expect? Assassin's Creed has always been about the forced het babies since they insisted on that bullshit with the "every character is a descendant of the historical player character!" for that ridiculous "DNA memory" gimmick.

Re: Spoilers for Assassin's Creed: Odyssey DLC

[(Anonymous)]

Then they shouldn't have allowed you to romance same-sex characters. This makes all of that completely pointless, and honestly kind of annoying because they made such a big deal out of how Great and Inclusive they were being, only to turn around and be like "anyway too bad if you have a lesbian/gay character, they're DOIN THE HET SEX NOW"

Re: Spoilers for Assassin's Creed: Odyssey DLC

[fishnchips]

Yes, it was shitty. But Assassin's Creed was never going to be about individual choice, no matter how much they liked to pretend it was. That franchise never was a multiple choice/free decision making RPG so I don't know why they even started with that. But knowing the games, it was always going to come down to het babies so I don't know why everyone's so surprised right now. And quite honestly, surprised at Ubisoft making dumb decisions? Really? Annoyed? Sure. But surprised? Eh.

(Personally, I was more annoyed at Fallout 4 back in the day because that one actually was supposed to be a free choice "play your own role" kind of RPG and it still made you have a kid from the get go, no choice about it.)