case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-01-30 07:14 pm

[ SECRET POST #4409 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4409 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #631.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - empty comment ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make

(Anonymous) 2019-01-31 06:03 am (UTC)(link)
I will defend bad writing if the person I'm disagreeing with is calling it bad for the wrong reasons. For example, when something that shouldn't happen in canon happens anyway because of bad writing, people will stubbornly argue that no, it didn't happen, because it couldn't have.

Honey child, if it was there on the screen, it happened. You did not hallucinate. The fallibility of the human writer cares not for your adherence to the laws of canon. It was bad writing you're allowed to hate, but you can't just say it didn't happen and get mad at the fandom for writing in compliance with it.

Re: Secrets you're too lazy to make

(Anonymous) 2019-01-31 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
This so hard.

There's always room for interpretation, but when something is presented plain to see, I don't get how some folks are just in denial of it.