[ SECRET POST #4413 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4413 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #632.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I can't count the number of discussions and think pieces I've seen about hairlessness in women being purposely designed to make them appear barely legal in order to titillate men who are into that sort of thing and whether that's exploitative in TV/movies, but the moment you suggest hairlessness in men might lead to the same connotations in some people's eyes, you're apparently a racist who doesn't appreciate the diversity of the male body. I'd argue that at least sometimes waxed chests are used to deliberately appear younger and less "threatening" in their masculinity, and perhaps you even see that in movies like Captain America (when the actor clearly has hair on his chest) because the target demographics are likely to be into that look and/or respond to the underlying messages it sends, not because "well, some men don't have a lot of body hair".