case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-02-06 07:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #4416 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4416 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #632.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-02-07 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
I sympathize but is there really a dearth of older/younger daddy kink pairings out there?

(Anonymous) 2019-02-07 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
Lots of people on tumblr are against that sort of thing cause they equate it to pedophilia. I see it on those "Do not interact" lists all the time. So yeah, one of the main sites for fandom has made it a pariah and there will be less material because of it.

(Anonymous) 2019-02-07 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
... how is it pedophilia when both characters are legal adults?

(Anonymous) 2019-02-07 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
I agree that this example isn't pedophilia, but this isn't always a good argument. Just think of the archetypal example, the 3000-year-old vampire who looks like a 10 year old.

(Anonymous) 2019-02-07 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
What about actual, living adults who are easily mistaken for kids? Does that still count?

(Anonymous) 2019-02-07 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, what I'm saying is you should try to look at the specific context of what's going on

(Anonymous) 2019-02-07 04:01 am (UTC)(link)
That's... still not pedophilia, because they're not a child.

(Anonymous) 2019-02-07 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
Then why would a 1000 year old loli be?

(Anonymous) 2019-02-07 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
That seems like an utterly useless point of view. If a fictional child is depicted as a child for every meaningful purpose - especially around being sexualized - then I think that's something that we can recognize, not something we have to ignore because of a transparent justification.
type_wild: (Tea - Masako)

[personal profile] type_wild 2019-02-07 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Because they're "child coded", because daddy kink normalises pedophilia, because like they used to be kids once, IDK. I'm pretty sure the only thing that isn't pedo these days is characters of age with no more than two years between them, and you're not allowed to ship anything involving characters that are younger than you.