[ SECRET POST #4423 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4423 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #633.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

That's not quite where I'm trying to draw the line - the point is not that Hermione thinks that what she's doing is in Harry's best interests. The point is that we know that what Hermione is doing is actually in Harry's best interests, and Harry is actually being very stupid by not agreeing with her in the first place, given the information available at the time and even more so in hindsight. I don't think it's controlling to do something to keep someone out of immediate moral peril.

[(Anonymous)]

If you rob someone of their own free choice, then yes, you are being controlling of them. You can argue that it's for the good, but the point remains that you are robbing them of the chance to make that choice for themselves.

[(Anonymous)]

I accept that there's some literal sense in which that's true, but I don't think that it matches up well with the connotative sense of the word, the sense in which it's synonymous with being domineering or manipulative, and I don't think it's an example of Hermione being unreasonable or doing anything wrong.