Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-02-20 05:46 pm
[ SECRET POST #4430 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4430 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #634.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-20 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-21 04:21 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 04:38 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-20 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-21 12:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-20 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-20 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-20 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-21 12:36 am (UTC)(link)Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) 2019-02-20 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) 2019-02-20 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-20 23:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 00:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-20 23:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) 2019-02-20 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-20 23:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 00:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 01:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 01:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 02:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 03:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 04:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
Re: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 04:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 04:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Maybe Shassie?
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 05:00 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-20 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-21 04:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-21 04:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-21 02:58 am (UTC)(link)Their dynamic that works for me as childhood friends would feel icky as lovers. I know that it wouldn't to many. Ymmv.
But shassie is standard enemies to lovers pretty much paint by numbers--not complicated to see its popularity. But I didn't really ship that either
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-21 03:14 am (UTC)(link)Would it really be all that different from, for example, House/Wilson?
I mean, I can definitely see Shassie as well, I think Shassie is a great ship. And people shipping Shassie definitely aren't being racist. But there is a pattern to look at.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-21 03:32 am (UTC)(link)Tbh I'm usually on the gen end, and I hate power imbalances in ships or where one character is a jerk.
My feelings is that most viewers of psych when it aired were teens, and fairly happy with the Canon het relationship. But older viewers sought out ship dynamics like friends to lovers like old comfy socks.
Always worth examining racist undercurrents so we can work on em. But it can go pretty far once you start: Stormpilot had a lot of criticism for any hints of Latin Lover tropes, or Sexy Black Man, which made it a little hard to attract sexy writing at all after awhile. Lots of gifs, but not a lot of people ready to risk the gauntlet
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 03:58 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2019-02-21 04:29 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-21 04:32 am (UTC)(link)(I did ship Shawn and Gus and was always disappointed that there was nothing for them then, but it leaves a bad taste in my mouth if it's become the accepted pairing because of virtue signalling rather than on its own merits...)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-02-21 06:29 am (UTC)(link)