[ SECRET POST #4449 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4449 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[sense8]


__________________________________________________



03.
[mcu (bucky barnes /winter soldier)]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Hazel, from The Umbrella Academy]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The Breakfast Club]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Brooklyn Nine-Nine]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Wil Wheaton and Gates McFadden from Star Trek: The Next Generation]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Overwatch League]









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 34 secrets from Secret Submission Post #637.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[herpymcderp]

Ok so... here's my problem with how people usually rate player quality for e-sports shit. It's usually about KDR or stats rankings.

But here's the thing, that's not all there is to a match. It really depends on the game type. Let's use a capture the flag type scenario: being better at defense and support is a more valuable skill than just getting a high kill count. Being able to make assists is something a lot of players just can't get their head around, but it's a fucking huge boon to a team if you have someone on it that can reliably do so.

So yeah, I've never seen her play or anything, but I automatically side-eye anyone who says someone isn't a very good player just because they don't have the best stats.

[(Anonymous)]

This. Plus, in a game like Overwatch, stats can be really misleading.