[ SECRET POST #4462 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4462 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 53 secrets from Secret Submission Post #639.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[11thmirror]

Kinda getting the feeling that, as long as someone somewhere can call it a fetish, folks will go "This thing is obviously the creator's fetish, how disgusting of them to flaunt it where The Children^TM will see!"

[(Anonymous)]

That's kind of what I was thinking. Like yes, these things can be fetishized but they can also exist in a non-fetish context?

[dinogrrl]

Yeah, this. Sometimes I get the feeling that people conflate an artist/writer's style and favorite themes with them having a fetish. Also I kinda side-eye when the term is applied to things in kids' shows, especially when those shows have 'non-mainstream' themes in them.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm also pretty sure that the only way to NOT come off like a foot fetishist if you're designing characters, is to make sure your characters' feet are off screen all the time or just drawn as indistinct shapes at the ends of their legs.

Seriously, bare feet, sandals, heels, boots... all fetishy. There is no non-fetishy footwear, and bare feet are also suspect.