case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-03-29 07:02 pm

[ SECRET POST #4466 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4466 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________


07.


__________________________________________________




















08. [SPOILERS for The Umbrella Academy]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for The Tenth Line]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for The Gentleman's Guide to Vice and Virtue]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for discussion of domestic abuse]



__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for discussion of rape, pedophilia]
































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #639.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-03-30 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
What about mob justice though? Social media has made it abundantly clear that what public opinion is can and will cost people jobs regardless of what's actually true.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2019-03-30 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
That's a problem. But I think there has to be some middle ground. I think there should be some level of evidence, but I don't think it has to be the level of evidence required by a court.

(Anonymous) 2019-03-30 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
Even though it's easier than ever to manipulate or completely falsify evidence?

(Anonymous) 2019-03-30 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
But what is your solution to the scenario where people really actually do fucked up, awful things.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2019-03-30 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
Yes. I think it is ridiculous to say to victims "you have to prove to the public as much as you have to prove to the court before anyone will believe you." Yes, that means that sometimes we're going to believe people who turn out to be lying. But it is much better to air on that side than it is to air on the side of never believing victims (which is mostly where we're at now, with the occasional exception).

(Anonymous) 2019-03-30 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
It's one thing to ask that people use their reason and try not to immediately rush to judgment. It's another thing entirely to demand a presumption of innocence and proof beyond a shadow of a reasonabke doubt. There is a big leap between those things.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2019-03-30 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
This.