case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-04-04 07:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #4472 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4472 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #640.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

OP

(Anonymous) 2019-04-05 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
My issue is more with the denial that adopted siblings are real siblings. I have adopted people in my family (two cousins). They are just as much real family as biological family. But saying Thor/Loki isn't incest is saying that adopted siblings aren't real siblings. And that's what I have a problem with.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2019-04-05 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
Some people define incest as being inherently a biological issue. If you're biologically related, then it's incest; if you're not, then it's not. I can see why you feel the way you do, but I disagree with how you interpret this viewpoint. It's not that they think adopted siblings aren't real siblings; it's just that they think non-biological incest isn't incest. For some people, the fundamental element of incest isn't psychological, it's genealogical.

Personally, I have no horse in this race.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2019-04-05 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)
This. Thank you!