case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-04-09 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #4477 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4477 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
[American Gods, season two]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.
[James Gunn]


__________________________________________________



07.
(Riverdale)


__________________________________________________



08.
[Gotham, Penguin/Riddler]


__________________________________________________



09.
[one direction]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 30 secrets from Secret Submission Post #641.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
riddian: (ORLY?)

[personal profile] riddian 2019-04-10 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I've never seen a case where the admins banned somebody based on hearsay. If you want me to believe that it was people yelling on Tumblr or whatever that got him banned, instead of something he did that broke site rules, you're going to need to provide some receipts. Otherwise you're full of shit. I don't know or particularly care about his inclinations, I don't know what got him banned, but I do know that a lot of justly banned people like to screech about their innocence to try to salvage their reputation, and this looks like more of the same. It's like Clairvoyant with extra discourse.