Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-04-27 09:52 am
[ SECRET POST #4495 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4495 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #644.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions
(Anonymous) 2019-04-27 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions
There's no care or thought put into designing any of it.
Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions
(Anonymous) 2019-04-27 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions
(Anonymous) 2019-04-27 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions
(Anonymous) 2019-04-27 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions
(Anonymous) 2019-04-27 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions
(Anonymous) 2019-04-28 12:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: Secrets (fandom or non fandom)/unpopular opinions
(Anonymous) 2019-04-28 05:07 pm (UTC)(link)I've never had much if the "I only liked that band when they were obscure" attitude towards this kind of thing. As an 80s kid growing up with so many fandoms that had been established before I was born (Star Trek, Star Wars, Doctor Who, Tolkien, Sherlock Holmes, most popular comic book superheroes, a LOT of significant and popular SF&F lit...) and with my own fandom participation being dependent upon adult-controlled spaces like the cons my parents brought me to (there were VERY few kids or teens at cons in the 80s - it was a very different fannish landscape) I was always hyperaware that there was an existing club that I was meery hanging around the edges of. It was very different than what internet fandom would become by the late 90s, where young people could be cagey about their age to participate in adult-dominated spaces, or just create their own spaces, e.g. start their own Geocities site, sign up for their own social media account, or post their fic to an archive for free. (Internet fandom a la Usenet and Compuserve existed in the 80s, but like most kids, I didn't have access to those things, and I wouldn't be surprised if those spaces skewed older because of it.) What I'm getting at is my sense of exclisivity in fandom and sense of ownership over media has always been kind of warped because I've never lived in a fandom bubble, so it's hard for me to care that something has "gone mainstream."
Meanwhile, I have no problem finding essentially unlimited fanworks for free, so the fact that people might have a Patreon, or a monetized YouTube channel, or put out exclusives behind a paywall doesn't bother me. I'm still getting what I want.
Besides, where am I supposed to draw the line between fanworks that should be free and regular entertainment that I should expect to pay for? I draw a pretty hard line with fan fiction, but there's a sizeable chunk of my fannish consuption that consists of YouTube videos that fall under the analysis and commentary categories. (I used to really love critical discussions on message boards meta posts on LJ and such, too, and I still love them when I can find them, but I'm terrible at using tumblr.) That's not fundamentally different than published books and TV specials on literary criticism or media studies topics that people get paid to make. I mean, Lindsay Ellis makes YouTube videos for PBS as well as her own channel, so why would I draw the line and say her own channel shouldn't have commercials or a Patreon?