[ SECRET POST #4511 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4511 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 34 secrets from Secret Submission Post #646.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

For the new movies, it's not "sticking in a gay romance", it would literally just be stating that the existing romance, you know, existed. One memory/flashback shot of a kiss. A single line saying "I loved him". She doesn't need to retroactively insert a sex scene into the 6th Harry Potter book, but we're making new media now and she's running out of excuses.

[(Anonymous)]

I think this is a good point as well - no one is obligated to have queer romances, but if you have a character you say is queer and in a queer romantic relation ship, and you consistently choose not to depict that, I think it's reasonable for people to ask questions.

[(Anonymous)]

THIS.

[(Anonymous)]

They made orgasm faces while intertwining hands, I mean... I just don't know how else you can interpret that.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh my god you guys they made ORGASM faces.

[(Anonymous)]

w h i l e

i n t e r t w i n i n g

h a n d s

Just bro things, right?

[(Anonymous)]

TIL straight people never hold hands. Amazing. Must be super gay.

[(Anonymous)]

Butthurt shipper or homophobe with their head up their ass? We just don't know.

[(Anonymous)]

Nayrt but it seems weird that the person arguing in favor of more explicit, unambiguous gay representation would be homophobic. Very strange insult.

[(Anonymous)]

Nah, the ship sucks, but I'm gay as hell and want to see gays on screen in a major franchise just one time.

[(Anonymous)]

Nice try, troll. Why would homophobes be unhappy that Dumbledore and Grindlewald’s relationship is only implied and not shown or mentioned in the movies?

[(Anonymous)]

Can you link these orgasm faces

[(Anonymous)]

Agreed. People are praising Korra writers to high heavens for doing the same thing. Why is it different when Rowling's the one doing this?

[(Anonymous)]

It seemed pretty obvious they were in love in the movie. It was obviously intentional. I agree it'd be cool to see an on-screen kiss but it's somehow a homophobic thing that it wasn't included.