[ SECRET POST #4518 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4518 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #647.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

On one hand, I know your heart is in the right place. Asian minorities in Western countries are pretty invisible in mainstream media compared to other groups and I 100% agree a Japanese lead or sublead in that movie would've been great to see.

On the other hand,
*Japanese character
*Japanese property
there's no such thing as an Asian property... Pokemon didn't emerge out of the entire Asian region. If we're gonna pay homage to the origins of Pokemon, it should be a Japanese character. "Any ol' Asian All Look Same" runs the risk of being racist in a whole other way. And putting in an Indian lead because it's "an Asian property" wouldn't be the same, would it?

Don't get me wrong, I totally get where you're coming from. Just wanted to point that out.

[(Anonymous)]

+1

[supermanda]

I'm glad this is the first comment