case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-05-23 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #4521 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4521 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.
[Nine Lives Man]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Citizen Kane]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 11 secrets from Secret Submission Post #647.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-05-24 03:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree that, if people are going to have these beliefs, they shouldn't be legally restrained from publishing them. I don't really think the benefit of foreknowledge outweighs the effect that these things have as propaganda, and I think you can publicize those extremist views in ways that don't serve as propaganda, but it's hard to justify legally banning things.

At the same time, I don't think it's morally right for people to have those beliefs. I think it's morally wrong to write or publish that book. I don't think the world is a better place because someone was willing to write and publish it. I don't think it's a good thing that people have those views in the first place that they need to be publicized. So in that sense, I don't think it has a place in the world at all. The world would be better off if it didn't exist.