[ SECRET POST #4523 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4523 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Sound of Music]


__________________________________________________



03.
(Dead by Daylight)


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Mummy Returns]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Aladdin]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Criminal Minds, S05E23 "Our Darkest Hour", S06E01 "The Longest Night"]


__________________________________________________



07.
[ReBoot: The Guardian Code]













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 38 secrets from Secret Submission Post #648.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Fandom secrets you're too lazy to make...

[(Anonymous)]

The people who most ardently believe you don't have that right are the copyright holders of the source materials, because they need to protect their meal tickets. The rest are fans who are (not incorrectly) concerned that allowing fanfic writers to openly solicit payments will eventually lead to aforementioned copyright holders and their lawyers bringing their wrath down upon all fanfiction altogether.

It's nothing about you as a person, so get over yourself. Everyone only cares about how it will affect them.

Re: Fandom secrets you're too lazy to make...

[(Anonymous)]

SA - Oops, replied to wrong comment. I agree with you.

Re: Fandom secrets you're too lazy to make...

[(Anonymous)]

If the point is that you shouldn't make money off of material derived from copyright, then there's two things that don't make sense to me.

One, do you make the same objection to fan artists who make money off of copyright violations? Two, why does OP have all this stuff talking about KoFi and Patreon versus traditionally published work, when that has nothing at all to do with original work versus copyrighted work? It's totally unrelated and weird.