case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-05-28 06:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #4526 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4526 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #648.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-05-29 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Trek canon itself tends to do the ignoring for you with some stuff, which makes it easy as a fan to ignore those things. As far as I know, Trek TV/movie canon (the only Trek canon that's canon) has *never* referenced Sybil since, at least not in any way that matters. I can see how the MCU might make that harder by continuing to make certain things relevant. We already know the next Spiderman movie will reference Tony being dead. Endgame isn't going to be a Final Frontier situation. Sorry folks.