[ SECRET POST #4528 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4528 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06. nf












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #648.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

They don't HAVE a direct person like a kidnapper. They have a *very* popular celebrity who brags about making weapons. It isn't like Tony Stark is just some unknown gun manufacturer. He is a celebrity. If Tom Cruise made a crossbow that killed your parent, you would hate Tom Cruise.

[(Anonymous)]

This was my thought. Tony was never exactly low-profile.

OP

[(Anonymous)]

I hate this kind of comments: Imagine a terrible thing happen to you, what'd you do?

I think their motivation is illogical. Most people whould hate the person who dropped the bomb and wouldn't side with criminals to get their revenge. It just doesn't make sense.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

They did also hate the people who dropped the bomb; Steve just wasn't one of them because at the time he was "dead" and completely out of the picture. Tony, on the other hand, was the face of Stark Industries at the time, and according to the first Iron Man movie was actively involved in advertising and selling the weapons with his name on them. They can hate America AND Tony in that situation.

ayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Now I wonder if they ever went after those who dropped the bomb. I'm a movie Wanda fan but I've never seen it explored in fics.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

Elsewhere in this thread, you seem baffled that people would hold weapon manufacturers accountable for global conflicts and think that they exist to "arm US soldiers with the best weapons". I don't think you're qualified to comment on what's politically realistic.

ayrt

[(Anonymous)]

And here's why we have so few named users on fs.