[ SECRET POST #4554 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4554 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Dragonheart]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Dark]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Good Omens]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Murder Mystery]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Becoming Jane]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #652.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

What people are entertained by is a really subjective thing. A critic's job is to analyze the movie on a more objective level and let people know the good and the bad. Apparently a lot of people think the Transformers movies are very entertaining because they keep making a fuck ton of money, but they aren't good movies, and I'd be concerned by critics who say they're anything above average.

[(Anonymous)]

I'd argue that while there is a certain level of objectivity in media, there is a lot less of it than most critics are willing to admit. Mostly quality is subjective.

[(Anonymous)]

But I think a good critic or reviewer should also be able to, or at least try to, understand why they're popular and identify the elements that make them popular, even if they ultimately reject them.

And then there's a question of, like, what is Rotten Tomatoes as a site trying to accomplish?