[ SECRET POST #4563 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4563 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[XKCD's What If?]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Poirot/Columbo]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #653.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT - people should be able to civilly air out their criticisms without being attacked for it. Criticizing their criticisms is fine, but if they're being civil and the response is "fuck you and your anti bullshit,you're a bully, people like you are scum," then that's fucked up.

[(Anonymous)]

people should be able to civilly air out their criticisms without being attacked for it

You seem sorely misled about how the internet works.

[(Anonymous)]

If your argument is just that internet discourse is unreasonable and constantly full of shit and there's nothing one can do about it, doesn't that cut just as much against secret!OP?

[(Anonymous)]

MTE

[(Anonymous)]

I don't see a lot of people getting called anti's for being civil and non-judgmental. I'm sure it happens, but I can't believe it happens as often as people getting told they're pedos because of their ships.

[(Anonymous)]

They should be able to do that, but they should also not put that stuff in the main tags.