[ SECRET POST #4592 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4592 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
[Wonderfalls]







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #657.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

First, "gay-coded" is your interpretation. Other people might interpret the same characters as asexual, and unless there's some sort of confirmation in the canon/from the showrunners, either is equally valid IMO.

Second, yes, there needs to be more gay characters. But there are almost no asexual characters and I can understand asexual people wanting more representation.

(I can sympathize with the asexual side of this argument because I'm bi, and we don't get much representation either, while it feels like there are a ton of gay characters. Not as many as straight characters, obviously, but way more than bi or asexual ones.)