[ SECRET POST #4592 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4592 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
[Wonderfalls]







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #657.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

You're saying that headcanoning straight characters as gay is the same as headcanoning gay characters as asexual.

The difference is, there isn't exactly a dearth of straight characters.

[(Anonymous)]

No, I meant that headcanoning characters whose sexuality isn't specifically stated as gay or asexual is equally valid. If the character is gay in canon, then that's kind of iffy, but there are asexual people who are romantically interested in the same gender so I don't think it's awful or anything. Like, for example, an asexual person who's interested in the same gender sees this canon gay character who clearly likes the same gender but doesn't seem particularly interested in sex itself and identifies with them and thinks "hey, maybe this character is like me!"...idk, I just don't think that's some horribly problematic headcanon, but that's just me.

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Yeah, as an asexual person in a relationship with someone of the same gender, I don't get AYRT's continuing to discuss this as though asexual and gay are always mutually exclusive labels.

Unless the asexual headcanoners are insisting asexual means aromantic asexual. If they mean that, then AYRT should specify that, because that's a different thing. Aro-ace is mutually exclusive with gay.

[(Anonymous)]

Wait, which character are we talking about here that's textually gay?

[(Anonymous)]

In canon he's not interested in dating girls. That can be interpreted in a variety of ways, including that in canon he's the survivor of rapey body horror. A definitive artistic statement about Will's sexuality has been left open for a future season. And I'm really not inclined to give producers cookies for ambiguity after 150 years of it.

And ace and LGBTQ people can empathize over compulsory heterosexuality. If someone reads Will as ace because he's uncomfortable with that, go for it.