case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-08-24 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #4614 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4614 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 43 secrets from Secret Submission Post #661.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-08-24 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think that makes you a right-wing conservative. I think stamping out materials that display or promote harm to IRL children is a good, moral thing.

But I don't think a fictional story concerning fictional children (when appropriately tagged, because it's NOT something you should just post randomly where anyone could stumble across it without knowing what they're about to read) is promoting or displaying it. Can fiction influence reality? Of course, but it's not going to be because of someone's pokemon fic. And equating the two does nothing to solve or address the first and does create harm with trying to suppress the second, because it opens the door suppress other things. When Strikethrough happened, conservative groups got a bunch of fandom and support communities shut down through fear of the first.