case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-08-24 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #4614 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4614 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 43 secrets from Secret Submission Post #661.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-08-25 09:17 am (UTC)(link)
In my opinion, it's the same reason why in real life wealthy masc4masc white gay couples (and also wealthy transgender individuals who pass) don't get and outright reject femme guys, genderqueer individuals and any other layer of LGBTQIA+ that challenges the cis-het norm. And I hate to yell PATRIARCHY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL!! but I do believe that this is what it comes down to when they demonise anything outside the cis-het vanilla norm, whether it's kinky fantasies, or presentation and self-expression IRL.

(Anonymous) 2019-08-25 05:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree. It's largely internalized patriarchy when people are reactionary.

I do think being against writing explicit smut about preadolescent individuals is a reasonable position. And that a secret anon post is a reasonable place for it. And that the comments of such a story are NOT a reasonable place to share that position. Context matters.