case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-08-25 04:06 pm

[ SECRET POST #4615 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4615 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Veronica Mars]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Order]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Good Omens]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Avengers Endgame]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Harlots]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Mindhunter]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #661.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2019-08-26 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
I liked Natasha's storyline. I'm glad they killed her off precisely because it was a more meaningful storyline. It was a great way for her story to end. It gave emotion. Killing him off just wouldn't have meant much. And it just worked for me as a good finish to her story.

(Anonymous) 2019-08-26 07:11 am (UTC)(link)
Same. Like, I am sad she's gone, and a big part of me does want her back and/or wish she hadn't died in the first place. But a slightly bigger part of me appreciates that it was a good and meaningful end for her.

(Anonymous) 2019-08-26 07:17 am (UTC)(link)
SA - Also, I find it weird when people act like killing Nat was some kind of slight to the character, because, "Hawkeye is boring, they should've killed him instead." Like, yeah, that's why they killed Nat not Hawkeye (or at least a significant part of it). Killing Hawkeye was the cheap and easy route. He's not that important, to the story or to most viewers. I think most people expected them to kill Hawkeye in that scene. Whereas Nat was "too important to kill." Hence, she had to be the one to go or it would've felt predictable and cheap.

(Anonymous) 2019-08-26 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
that's surprisingly naive as a comment because natasha's death had zero impact once the scene ended (wasn't even included in the funeral?), so clearly the movie wasn't banking on people giving that big of a shit.
"too predictable" is the reason and we all know by now that writers who think not being predictable is the pinnacle of writing need to be fucking purged.

(Anonymous) 2019-08-26 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)
This comment is jumping to some oddly irrational conclusions. I honestly have no idea how you're interpreting things the way you are. It just doesn't make a lot of sense, like???