case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-10-26 03:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #4677 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4677 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 45 secrets from Secret Submission Post #670.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Secret makers mining thread

(Anonymous) 2019-10-26 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I wish published fiction had a tagging database that I could filter like AO3 tags. Asking for recs is not a good substitute.

Re: Secret makers mining thread

(Anonymous) 2019-10-26 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
yes!!! especially selfpub

Re: Secret makers mining thread

(Anonymous) 2019-10-26 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I mentioned this the other day on my twitter, that our generation views tagging as normal and Amazon/GoodReads simply isn't up to the task. (Plus paid algorithms.)

it would be a huge task, and wow... my mind is still breaking thinking about it.

(Especially with the way some self-pub authors are scamming the system.)
philstar22: (Default)

Re: Secret makers mining thread

[personal profile] philstar22 2019-10-26 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree. It is so hard to tell what is actually going to be in a book sometimes. And given how prevalent dubcon/outright rape is in erotic fiction, I've stopped buying/downloading it and just stick to the ones I have already read and know are okay.