case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-12-04 06:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #4716 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4716 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #675.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: FX's A Christmas Carol trailer

[personal profile] tabaqui 2019-12-05 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
I think that was Cratchet's wife, not his daughter in law? Scrooge had no children.
kaijinscendre: (Default)

Re: FX's A Christmas Carol trailer

[personal profile] kaijinscendre 2019-12-05 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
For some reason I thought he called him uncle or something. Regardless, no clue how they would redeem him from that.
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: FX's A Christmas Carol trailer

[personal profile] tabaqui 2019-12-05 02:15 am (UTC)(link)
What pisses me off is that they felt the need to add that scene at all. It certainly isn't in the book. 100 percent unnecessary.

It's like if there isn't a scene with a woman being sexually humiliated in some way, they can't call it good.