case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-01-08 08:13 pm

[ SECRET POST #4751 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4751 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #680.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

nayrt

(Anonymous) 2020-01-09 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)
The idea is that (most) sex workers are victims of a violent system, which the Nordic model relieves by placing the blame with the customers whose demand keeps a (presumably exploitative) market running.

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2020-01-09 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Sure I understand the logic of it. It's a way to penalize sex work and eliminate the sex trade without directly targeting sex workers with legal sanctions. But that presupposes that you should penalize sex work and eliminate the sex trade. If you think that there's something wrong with sex work as work, that makes sense. If the conditions of sex work are the problem, and they aren't fundamental to sex work as compared to other types of work, and you don't have a fundamental problem with people engaging in sex work if they want to, then the Nordic Model makes no sense at all.